Skip to main
A plain-English orientation to the most-studied research peptides across tissue repair, the growth-hormone axis, metabolic, longevity, immune and cognitive research — what each one is, how it works, and what the literature actually shows.

CONTACT / CORRECTIONS

Have you found a claim that doesn’t match the study?

Send the words you question and a supporting paper or agency notice. We can then check the claim.

What can you include when asking for a correction?

A claim about hunger or healing may not fit the study cited. You can contact Peptides National when you notice that mismatch. You might find a numbered source attached to the wrong claim.

Your note gives us a starting point by naming the disputed words.

First, give the page address and quote the disputed sentence. Then name the country or drug agency if approval is involved. Include the original paper or agency source supporting your correction. A study reviewed by fellow researchers can also help.

For a new rule, include the dates stated in the source. A notice can be published before the rule takes effect. Those dates aren't always the same. You can think of the note as pointing to one newspaper line that needs correction.

Address for corrections: editors@peptidesnational.com

We use this address to check claims in the guide. We can't assess symptoms or choose treatment for your care. We also can't locate products, judge suppliers, or settle permission for a purchase. Your health questions belong with your doctor.

The relevant authority handles local legal and competitive sport questions. A correction request doesn't replace those answers for your own situation.

What can you expect after sending the source?

We compare your source with the disputed claim. With studies, we look at the patients and changes the researchers reported. We also examine which treatments researchers compared. For approval, we check the country, product, use, and date the rule begins.

You might not receive an individual reply.

If the source supports a narrower claim, the words need narrowing. A useful correction needs evidence behind the proposed change. General questions may already have answers on the peptide pages, comparison, or FAQ.

Checking a correction can lead to revised words or another source. If the paper doesn't show an error, the claim may stay unchanged. You can't use this address to request products or paid space.